ComPRehension: Public Relations Professional Development Blog
  • ComPRehension
  • Public Relations & Communications Training
  • Training Calendar
  • Public Relations Conferences
  • PRSA

Currently viewing and reading

Which is the Best Definition for Public Relations? Vote Now

Posted by Gerard F. Corbett, APR, Fellow PRSA on February 13th 2012  

Following a productive period of submissions, comments and deliberation, we are pleased today to announce the final candidates for a modern definition of public relations. The definitions you see below have been developed by PRSA’s Definition of Public Relations Task Force, in consultation with our 12 global initiative partners. The candidates reflect nearly 1,000 submissions received last November and the hundreds of comments many of you provided on the draft definitions we presented last month.

Public voting is open from Feb. 13–26, 2012. We anticipate announcing the final winning definition, based on the public vote, the week of Feb. 27, 2012.

Vote on a Modern Definition of Public Relations Here

How The Definitions Were Developed

From Jan. 11–23, 2012, PRSA hosted a public-comment period for feedback on three draft definitions. Those drafts were based on an analysis of 927 submitted definitions received during the initial crowdsourcing phase, as well as feedback from a variety of blog posts and online commentary.

PRSA then convened a second Definition of Public Relations Summit with our initiative partners to pore over all submissions and public comments, using that information to revise the candidate definitions. What you see below represents the outcome and output of that meeting.

We’ve made a few minor changes to the original draft definitions. We listened to your feedback and made great effort to include that in the final candidate definitions. The wording is tighter, some redundancies have been removed and words that can be construed as jargon (e.g., “stakeholders” and “audiences”) have been replaced by more common language.

In short, the candidate definitions represent the perspective and wishes of the profession. We said from the start that no one entity would “own” this definition; rather, it will belong to the profession. It is up to you to vote on which definition you feel personifies the modern role and value of public relations. PRSA will adopt the winning definition to replace our 1982 description.

What’s Next

We ask you to vote on one of the three candidate definitions below.

Of course, the process doesn’t have to end there. Please free to add further feedback and opinions in the comments section of this post and other online forums. The success that this campaign has achieved thus far — bringing together a global profession to collectively discuss and debate the changing role of public relations — would not be possible without your input and support.

PRSA may be leading this campaign but it has truly taken a village to make it work. For that, we thank you.

Voting closes Feb. 26, so get in your note now!

Gerard F. Corbett, APR, Fellow PRSA, is chair and CEO of the Public Relations Society of America.

This post originally appeared on Public Relations Defined.

Create your free online surveys with SurveyMonkey, the world’s leading questionnaire tool.

under: Advocacy, Corporate Communications and Public Relations
Tags: Corporate Communications and Public Relations, PR definition
Social: Digg del.icio.us Stumble it Technorati

Related Post

  • Building a Grassroots Army on the Internet: A Guide for Adopters at All Stages (April 2nd, 2013)
  • Should Public Relations Professionals be Allowed to Edit Wikipedia Articles? (February 23rd, 2012)
  • 12 Trends to Watch: 2012 Public Relations Forecast #PRin2012 (January 3rd, 2012)
  • More Than Words: How to Really Redefine the Term “Public Relations” (December 9th, 2011)
  • What is PR? An Updated Definition for Public Relations (November 21st, 2011)

No Comment Received

« Think — Don’t Overthink: Accreditation in Public Relations (APR)
Advertising Value Equivalency (AVE): What PR Practitioners Need to Know »

Welcome



Join the public relations conversation and get connected with expert insight from our guest bloggers! The views and opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policies or positions of PRSA.

Search

Categories

Archives

Subscribe to the PRSA blog.

  • Feed Icon via RSS Feed or eMail


    Your email is safe. Privacy Policy.

Guidelines & Policies

    • Terms of Use
    • Submissions Policy and Guidelines

Join PRSA!

  • With your PRSA membership, you will:

    • Stay on top of emerging public relations trends and industry news.
    • Be a part of a vibrant community of more than 22,000 public relations professionals.
    • Accelerate your career -- at any level.

PRSA on Twitter

Switch site

    • Switch to our mobile site

Recent Entries

  • Confused About How to Tie PR Outputs to Organizational Outcomes? Consider the AMEC Framework!
  • Webinar Recap: Going Beyond the Press Kit to Engage Influencers
  • My Journey to APR: The “Self-Study” Edition
  • How Charles Ramsey, The NFL Draft And A Presidential Election Can Help You Land Your Next Big Media Hit
  • APR Goal: Inspire Lifelong Learning

Recent Comments

  • test in Webinar Recap: Going Beyond the Pre…
  • Michael Smart in How Charles Ramsey, The NFL Draft A…
  • Market Maven in How Charles Ramsey, The NFL Draft A…
  • Karla in How Charles Ramsey, The NFL Draft A…
  • Joan O'Fallon, … in APR Goal: Inspire Lifelong Learning…

Most Comments

  • Status Update: Millennial Staffers Can Update Your Social Media Plans  (31)
  • If You Can’t Measure It, It Doesn’t Count (12)
  • Five Ways to Make Your Content Stick (12)
  • Pull Stunts Like That and Word Spreads Fast … (9)
  • On Your Own Doesn’t Mean Going It Alone (8)
©2007-2013 ComPRehension
Powered by WordPress 3.4.1
Box-Tube Box Modulize WordPress Theme By Dezzain Studio
  • Public Relations & Communications Training
  • Training Calendar
  • Public Relations Conferences
  • Terms of Use
  • PRSA