ComPRehension: Public Relations Professional Development Blog
  • ComPRehension
  • Public Relations & Communications Training
  • Training Calendar
  • Public Relations Conferences
  • PRSA

Currently viewing and reading

Should Public Relations Professionals be Allowed to Edit Wikipedia Articles?

Posted by Marcia W. DiStaso, Ph.D. on February 23rd 2012  

To explore current public relations/communications practices with Wikipedia, I’m conducting a survey sponsored by the Arthur W. Page Center. My goal is to explore current engagement with Wikipedia and identify what changes are necessary.

I started researching Wikipedia in 2006 with Marcus Messner, Virginia Commonwealth University, and we have been arguing for years that public relations professionals should monitor their Wikipedia articles. Our 2010 study found that the negative content in corporate Wikipedia articles increased from 2006 to 2008 to 2010 and articles were becoming less focused on historical information and more on legal issues and controversies.

Given our findings and the wide use of Wikipedia by the public, having articles with incorrect or outdated information is not in anyone’s interest, but edits made by public relations professionals are unlikely to stick. Gerry Corbett, chair and CEO of the Public Relations Society of America, along with many others have suggested that Wikipedia policies should be based on accuracy and transparency in Wikipedia articles; no matter who does the editing, as long as the information is accurate, unbiased and properly referenced.

Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia, doesn’t agree and has stated “This is not complicated. There is a very simple “bright line” rule that constitutes best practice: do not edit Wikipedia directly if you are a paid advocate. Respect the community by interacting with us appropriately.”

Unfortunately, many public relations professionals don’t know the rule, tried playing by it without success, have chosen to ignore it, and/or quite possibly the rule needs to be changed or better communicated.

I’m a member of the Corporate Representatives for Ethical Wikipedia Engagement (CREWE) group and we are working with Jimmy Wales and other Wikipedia editors to identify how we can have a constructive relationship with the goal of maintaining accurate Wikipedia articles. This has proven not to be an easy task and hopefully my research study can help.

Please take a few minutes to complete this important survey. A white paper with the results will be available on Institute for Public Relations soon.

This article originally appeared as a Research Conversations blog posting on the Institute for Public Relations website.

Marcia W. DiStaso, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Public Relations at Pennsylvania State University, Chair of the PRSA Financial Communications Section, and Co-Chair of the PRSA National Research Committee.

under: Advocacy, Corporate Communications and Public Relations
Tags: Corporate Communications and Public Relations, Wikipedia
Social: Digg del.icio.us Stumble it Technorati

Related Post

  • Building a Grassroots Army on the Internet: A Guide for Adopters at All Stages (April 2nd, 2013)
  • Which is the Best Definition for Public Relations? Vote Now (February 13th, 2012)
  • 12 Trends to Watch: 2012 Public Relations Forecast #PRin2012 (January 3rd, 2012)
  • More Than Words: How to Really Redefine the Term “Public Relations” (December 9th, 2011)
  • What is PR? An Updated Definition for Public Relations (November 21st, 2011)

No Comment Received

« Advertising Value Equivalency (AVE): What PR Practitioners Need to Know
Five Ways to Make Your Company’s Strategic Communications More Effective »

Welcome



Join the public relations conversation and get connected with expert insight from our guest bloggers! The views and opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policies or positions of PRSA.

Search

Categories

Archives

Subscribe to the PRSA blog.

  • Feed Icon via RSS Feed or eMail


    Your email is safe. Privacy Policy.

Guidelines & Policies

    • Terms of Use
    • Submissions Policy and Guidelines

Join PRSA!

  • With your PRSA membership, you will:

    • Stay on top of emerging public relations trends and industry news.
    • Be a part of a vibrant community of more than 22,000 public relations professionals.
    • Accelerate your career -- at any level.

PRSA on Twitter

Switch site

    • Switch to our mobile site

Recent Entries

  • Confused About How to Tie PR Outputs to Organizational Outcomes? Consider the AMEC Framework!
  • Webinar Recap: Going Beyond the Press Kit to Engage Influencers
  • My Journey to APR: The “Self-Study” Edition
  • How Charles Ramsey, The NFL Draft And A Presidential Election Can Help You Land Your Next Big Media Hit
  • APR Goal: Inspire Lifelong Learning

Recent Comments

  • test in Webinar Recap: Going Beyond the Pre…
  • Michael Smart in How Charles Ramsey, The NFL Draft A…
  • Market Maven in How Charles Ramsey, The NFL Draft A…
  • Karla in How Charles Ramsey, The NFL Draft A…
  • Joan O'Fallon, … in APR Goal: Inspire Lifelong Learning…

Most Comments

  • Status Update: Millennial Staffers Can Update Your Social Media Plans  (31)
  • If You Can’t Measure It, It Doesn’t Count (12)
  • Five Ways to Make Your Content Stick (12)
  • Pull Stunts Like That and Word Spreads Fast … (9)
  • On Your Own Doesn’t Mean Going It Alone (8)
©2007-2013 ComPRehension
Powered by WordPress 3.4.1
Box-Tube Box Modulize WordPress Theme By Dezzain Studio
  • Public Relations & Communications Training
  • Training Calendar
  • Public Relations Conferences
  • Terms of Use
  • PRSA